Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Core i5-3340M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3655 days newer than Core i5-3340M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3340M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 20% better in Valheim than Core i5-3340M - 228 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3340M - 24 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
228
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3340M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |