Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Core i5-3337U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2339 days newer than Core i5-3337U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3337U
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 17 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 21% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-3337U - 108 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3337U - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3337U
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3337U | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
