Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1366 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3330 - 183 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i5-3330 - $103.0 vs $106.51
- Up to 11% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-3330 - $0.56 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 12 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $106.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7053 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$103
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7054 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |