Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Core i5-3320M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2965 days newer than Core i5-3320M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 8% better in Valheim than Core i5-3320M - 205 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3320M - 32 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$897.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3320M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |