Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Core i5-3320M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 375 days newer than Core i5-3320M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Core i5-3320M - 158 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3320M - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.89/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3093 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3320M | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |