Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i5-3210M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2890 days newer than Core i5-3210M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3210M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 26% better in New World than Core i5-3210M - 123 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3210M - 20 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$260
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $260 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3210M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |