Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms Core i5-3210M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4238 days newer than Core i5-3210M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3210M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 224% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-3210M - 162 vs 50 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3210M - 8 vs 4 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
162
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6945 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3210M | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |