Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2550K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3627 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2550K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2550K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-2550K - 135 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-2550K - $59.99 vs $99.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-2550K - $0.44 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-2550K doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7358 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7358 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 30th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2550K | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |