Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700U outperforms Core i5-2500S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700U is 2919 days newer than Core i5-2500S.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-2500S - 162 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500S - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500S - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2500S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Ryzen 7 3700U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500S | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
