Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2823 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $449.95 vs $1150.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.64 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 95 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 8% better in Valorant than Core i5-2500K - 757 vs 700 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 48 vs 4 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
700
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $449.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
757
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
42%
Price, $
$1150
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 250 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |