Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 1332 days older than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than FX-8370 - 47 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $276.99 vs $299.99
- Up to 1% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-2500K - $6.3 vs $6.38 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |