Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 4279 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $194.3 vs $469.99
- Up to 55% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i9-13900K - $0.76 vs $1.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 7% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i5-2500 - 276 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 32 vs 4 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
257
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$194.3
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $194.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13889 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
276
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.7/FPS
44%
Price, $
$469.99
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $469.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13900 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |