Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 2186 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - $24.95 vs $51.6
- Up to 50% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i3-7100T - $0.12 vs $0.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-2500 - 215 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
211
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$24.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $24.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8495 minutes ago
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8496 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |