Key Differences
In short — FX-8350 outperforms Core i5-2415M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8350 is 418 days newer than Core i5-2415M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2415M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Core i5-2415M - 44 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2415M - 8 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
44
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2415M | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |