Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 4279 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $70.0 vs $317.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-13700KF - $0.37 vs $1.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Valheim than Core i5-2400S - 230 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 24 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3893 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
230
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
26%
Price, $
$317.99
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $317.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3893 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |