Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $34.95 vs $225.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700F - $0.21 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-2400 - 191 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
170
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2884 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
17%
Price, $
$225.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2884 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |