Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 3393 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $34.95 vs $150.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.18 vs $0.72 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-2400 - 209 vs 192 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
192
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4846 minutes ago
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4847 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |