Buy on Amazon
$45
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $305
Availability
MSRP in USD: $305
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770S outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4770S is 875 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2300
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-4770S - $45.0 vs $104.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-4770S - $0.41 vs $0.88 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770S
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-2300 - 118 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
111
94.0677966101695%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$45
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2300 2.80GHz Quad-Core Desktop Processor
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1577 minutes ago
Core i7-4770S
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
46.590909090909086%
Price, $
$104
43%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-4770S Quad-Core Desktop Processor 3.1 GHZ 8 MB Cache- BX80646I74770S
Buy for $104 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Core i7-4770S
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2300
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
510
44.38642297650131%
Multi-Core
1490
41.63174070969545%
Intel Core i5-2300 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770S |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
