Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10600 - 218 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - $150.0 vs $294.99
- Up to 41% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-14600KF - $0.79 vs $1.35 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
218
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
58%
Price, $
$294.99
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $294.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12972 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12973 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |