Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 52% better in War Thunder than Core i5-10400F - 276 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $97.5 vs $625.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-14600K - $0.54 vs $2.27 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
276
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
23%
Price, $
$625.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $625.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
65%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$97.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $97.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14600K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |