Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 4061 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 28% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-3240T - 300 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $25.7 vs $235.6
- Up to 86% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-14600K - $0.11 vs $0.79 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
300
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
13.924050632911392%
Price, $
$235.6
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
234
78%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
15.930149679258731%
Multi-Core
971
6.035929632622614%
Intel Core i5-14600K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |