Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-7400 - 165 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $119.0 vs $175.81
- Up to 29% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-14400F - $0.76 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
71.02803738317756%
Price, $
$175.81
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $175.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
157
95.15151515151516%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$119
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1176
50.04255319148936%
Multi-Core
3232
28.453208909234966%
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |