Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-9100F - 198 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $56.99 vs $209.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-14400F - $0.33 vs $1.06 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.06/FPS
31%
Price, $
$209.99
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12080 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
174
87%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12081 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |