Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 20% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-7400 - 152 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - $119.0 vs $209.99
- Up to 32% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-14400 - $0.94 vs $1.38 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
68.11594202898551%
Price, $
$209.99
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1638 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
127
83.55263157894737%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$119
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1630 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1176
47.90224032586558%
Multi-Core
3232
26.220996268051273%
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |