Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 5765 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 28% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Phenom X4 9650 - 210 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - $19.95 vs $210.26
- Up to 88% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-14400 - $0.12 vs $1.0 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $210.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
164
78.0952380952381%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
9.69450101832994%
Multi-Core
765
6.20639299042674%
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | AMD Phenom X4 9650 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
Core i5 | Collection | Phenom X4 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Agena |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 65 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 11.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |