Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 266 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G6900 - 233 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $74.79 vs $249.98
- Up to 68% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-13600KF - $0.34 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
233
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
31%
Price, $
$249.98
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $249.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
219
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $74.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |