Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-9600 - 219 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $125.0 vs $799.99
- Up to 83% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-13400F - $0.61 vs $3.65 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.65/FPS
16.71232876712329%
Price, $
$799.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $799.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
205
93.60730593607306%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$125
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1462
63.842794759825324%
Multi-Core
4944
46.01209865053513%
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i5-9600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |