Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3503 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 43% better in War Thunder than Core i5-4670 - 237 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $140.0 vs $799.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-13400F - $0.84 vs $3.38 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.38/FPS
24.85207100591716%
Price, $
$799.99
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $799.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
166
70.042194092827%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1172
51.17903930131005%
Multi-Core
3228
30.041879944160076%
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 84 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |