Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570K.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 20% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-3570K - 458 vs 381 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Core i5-3570K
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $139.00 vs $849.99
- Up to 81% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-13400F - $0.36 vs $1.86 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
458
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
19%
Price, $
$849.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
381
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Core i5-3570K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 77 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |