Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 1766 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-7400 - 133 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $119.0 vs $159.53
- Up to 17% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-12600KF - $1.0 vs $1.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
133
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
83.33333333333334%
Price, $
$159.53
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for $159.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
119
89.47368421052632%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$119
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1176
47.57281553398058%
Multi-Core
3232
26.85277500830841%
Intel Core i5-12600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |