Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i5-12600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $175.0 vs $2399.0
- Up to 92% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - $0.93 vs $12.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-12600K - 194 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600K - 64 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
189
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$12.37/FPS
7%
Price, $
$2399
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for $2,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 32 |
16 | Threads | 64 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |