Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600K is 1526 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600K
- Performs up to 36% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 75 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-12600K - $109.99 vs $177.2
- Up to 15% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-12600K - $2.0 vs $2.36 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $177.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
55
73%
Value, $/FPS
$2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |