Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 4013 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 48% better in Rust than Core i5-2500 - 237 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - $29.52 vs $175.95
- Up to 76% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-12500 - $0.18 vs $0.74 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
24.324324324324323%
Price, $
$175.95
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $175.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
160
67.51054852320675%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
589
25.486802250108177%
Multi-Core
1695
18.66945698865514%
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |