Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the cheaper Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom X4 9650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 5031 days newer than the cheaper Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 27% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Phenom X4 9650 - 146 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-12500 - $39.99 vs $175.95
- Up to 71% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-12500 - $0.35 vs $1.21 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
28.92561983471074%
Price, $
$175.95
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $175.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1596 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
FPS
115
78.76712328767124%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1585 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
10.298572046733016%
Multi-Core
765
8.426038109924%
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | AMD Phenom X4 9650 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
Core i5 | Collection | Phenom X4 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Agena |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 65 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 11.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |