Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400T outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400T is 2697 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400T
- Performs up to 7% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 157 vs 147 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400T - 20 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-12400T
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2022
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
886
43.135345666991235%
Multi-Core
5378
72.15886220313968%
Intel Core i5-12400T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
