Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-7900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1653 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-7900X - 158 vs 142 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $412.83 vs $899.99
- Up to 49% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-12400F - $2.91 vs $5.7 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14056 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
142
89%
Value, $/FPS
$2.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$412.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $412.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14057 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |