Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1653 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 22% better in Starfield than Core i9-7900X - 71 vs 58 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $111.99 vs $325.0
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $111.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74115 minutes ago
Buy for $325 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74116 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Single-Core
1422
64.90187129164765%
Multi-Core
8781
98.55218855218855%
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |