Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Warcraft than Core i9-10900F - 208 vs 192 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $225.0 vs $899.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-12400F - $1.17 vs $4.33 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 20 vs 12 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.33/FPS
27%
Price, $
$899.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16228 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
192
92%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |