Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1653 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 5% better in Death Stranding than Core i9-7900X - 237 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $161.76 vs $412.83
- Up to 63% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-7900X - $0.68 vs $1.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 20 vs 12 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
237
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$161.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $161.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18093 minutes ago
Buy for $412.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18094 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |