Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $165.86 vs $582.8
- Up to 71% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $1.01 vs $3.49 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-11600KF - 167 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
98%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$165.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11824 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.49/FPS
28%
Price, $
$582.8
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $582.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11823 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |