Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 23% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 144 vs 117 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |