Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 798 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-9600KF - 204 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $150.0 vs $189.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11600K - $0.79 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
84.94623655913979%
Price, $
$189
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for $189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
191
93.62745098039215%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1587
72.59835315645013%
Multi-Core
5707
66.52290476745542%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |