Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-9350KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 798 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-9350KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-9350KF - 142 vs 136 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i3-9350KF - $179.99 vs $198.94
- Up to 13% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-9350KF - $1.27 vs $1.46 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9350KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 91 vs 125 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Buy for $198.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i3-9350KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |