Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 587 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Alan Wake 2 than EPYC 7742 - 125 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 125 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 128 vs 12 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$193.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $193.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD EPYC 7742 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Rome |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 64 |
12 | Threads | 128 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 225 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 22.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |