Buy on Amazon
$140
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 238 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 188 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - $140.0 vs $179.99
- Up to 24% better value when playing Stray than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - $0.74 vs $0.97 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-11600 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G Processor 7nm 3.7Ghz 6 cores 12 Threads Processor only (Tray)
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-11600
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Renoir |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
