Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3066 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 27% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-8320 - 124 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than FX-8320 - $140.0 vs $175.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than FX-8320 - $1.13 vs $1.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1512 minutes ago
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1511 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |