Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4150 - 200 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - $45.0 vs $184.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11500 - $0.25 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11500 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $184 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3082 minutes ago
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3083 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11500 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |