Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 4074 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 9% better in Rocket League than Xeon W3680 - 738 vs 677 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon W3680 - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Xeon W3680
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Xeon W3680 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Westmere-EP |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
