Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 2809 days newer than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 196 vs 166 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 45 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400H - 24 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 115 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |