Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3353 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 26% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2665 - 756 vs 599 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 45 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400H - 16 vs 12 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Xeon E5-2665
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2665 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 115 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
