Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 1786 days newer than Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 186 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400H - 16 vs 12 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Xeon E5-1660 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
